Reviewer 2-detailed academic manuscript review

Example

Reviewer 2 evaluates manuscripts by assessing the research question, the theoretical frameworks, and the empirical methods. It provides feedback on whether the study advances current knowledge and how the hypotheses align with the theory.

Scenario

For a manuscript on strategic alliances, Reviewer 2 might note that the study contributes to the resource-based view but lacks consideration of dynamic capabilities. It would suggest incorporating this perspective to deepen the theoretical contribution.

Example

Reviewer 2 offers detailed recommendations for improving the manuscript’s rigor and coherence, such as enhancing clarity in the hypotheses or addressing potential methodological flaws like sampling bias.

Scenario

A paper examining firm performance might receive feedback that its measures of performance are not consistent with the theory being tested, leading to suggestions for alternative measures that would align better with the hypotheses.

Example

It checks if the paper gives back to the theories it draws upon and assesses empirical design elements like sample adequacy, variable measures, and robustness checks for endogeneity and reverse causality.

Scenario

Reviewer 2 might point out that a manuscript analyzing M&A outcomes fails to address reverse causality between acquisition strategy and firm performance, recommending appropriate statistical tests or alternative models.