Unbelievable! The Easiest Way to Bypass AI Content Detection - How I Did It!

Andy Stapleton
10 Apr 202409:58

TLDRIn this video, the creator tests five AI content bypass tools to determine their effectiveness against AI detection systems. After submitting a rewritten PhD abstract through each tool, the results varied, with some showing high AI originality percentages and others none at all. Originality AI proved to be the best at detecting AI-generated content, while Turnitin and GPT-0 were less effective. The creator advises against submitting the AI-generated content directly and suggests using it as a scaffold for one's own understanding and work.

Takeaways

  • 🔍 The video compares five AI content bypass tools to test their effectiveness against AI detection systems.
  • 📜 The test started with an original PhD abstract from 2011 to ensure it was not AI-generated.
  • 📊 AI detection tools like Turnitin and GPT-0 were tested against the original and rewritten abstracts.
  • 💡 Turnitin was found to be ineffective in detecting AI content, while Originality was the best at detecting AI.
  • 🛠 Five AI bypass tools were tested: Fasley AI, Stealth Writer, Undetectable, Bypass AI, and Hicks Bypass.
  • 💰 The cost of testing these services was significant, amounting to hundreds of dollars.
  • 📝 Each AI bypass tool was used to rewrite the original abstract, and the results were analyzed for AI detection.
  • 🚫 Fasley AI and Undetectable were the most successful in bypassing AI detection, with Originality detecting only a small chance of AI content.
  • 📉 Bypass AI was not effective, as Originality still detected a 100% AI chance.
  • 📈 Originality continued to be the most accurate in detecting AI content, even after using bypass tools.
  • 🚨 The video advises against submitting AI-generated content directly and suggests using it as a scaffold for original work and understanding.

Q & A

  • What was the purpose of the original PhD abstract used in the script?

    -The original PhD abstract, written in 2011, was used as a control to ensure it was not AI-generated content. It was tested in various AI detection tools to establish a baseline of zero AI content.

  • How did the AI rewrite the original PhD abstract, and what were the detection results?

    -The AI was instructed to rewrite the abstract for a PhD thesis. The results varied, with Turnitin showing 40% AI originality, Originality detecting it as 100% AI, and GPT-0 showing 94% AI content.

  • What was the performance of Turnitin in detecting AI-generated content?

    -Turnitin was not very effective in detecting AI-generated content, even when presented with content that was clearly AI-generated.

  • Which AI detection tool was found to be the most effective in the test?

    -Originality was the most effective tool in detecting AI-generated content, even when the content had been processed through AI bypass tools.

  • What were the results of using the Fasley AI bypass tool?

    -Fasley was able to bypass AI detection with Turnitin showing a 3% chance of AI generation and GPT-0 showing zero, indicating successful bypassing of AI detection.

  • How did Stealth Writer perform in the AI content detection test?

    -Stealth Writer managed to get a zero detection rate from Turnitin and GPT-0, but Originality detected it with a 39% AI originality score.

  • What was the outcome of using the 'Undetectable' AI bypass tool?

    -Undetectable successfully bypassed Turnitin and GPT-0 with zero detection, but Originality scored it with a 2% AI originality, indicating a very low chance of being detected as AI-generated.

  • How did the 'Bypass AI' tool perform in the AI detection test?

    -Bypass AI failed to bypass Originality's detection, scoring a 100% AI originality chance, but managed to get zero detection from Turnitin and GPT-0.

  • What were the results of using the 'Hick Bypass' tool?

    -Hick Bypass showed a 0% chance of AI generation according to Turnitin and GPT-0, but Originality detected it with a 56% AI originality score.

  • What is the ethical consideration mentioned in the script regarding the use of AI bypass tools?

    -The script suggests that while AI bypass tools can be used to generate content that is not detected as AI, it is not advisable to submit such content as one's own without further refinement and understanding, to avoid ethical issues of plagiarism.

  • What is the recommended use of AI-generated content according to the script?

    -The script recommends using AI-generated content as a scaffold for understanding and as a starting point for further work, rather than submitting it directly as one's own.

Outlines

00:00

🔍 AI Detection Bypass Test Results

The speaker discusses testing five services designed to bypass AI detection systems, using a 2011 PhD abstract as a baseline to ensure it's not flagged as AI-generated. They found that Turnitin was ineffective at detecting AI content, while Originality performed the best. The speaker paid for all services to test their efficacy, inputting content into a Word document to avoid detection of copied web content. The results varied, with some services like Fasley and Undetectable showing minimal AI detection, while others like Stealth Writer and Bypass AI were less successful. The speaker emphasizes the importance of not submitting AI-generated content directly but using it as a scaffold for one's own work.

05:01

📊 Comparative Analysis of AI Bypass Tools

In the second paragraph, the speaker continues to analyze the effectiveness of AI bypass tools, comparing their ability to fool AI detection systems like Turnitin, Originality, and GPT-0. They detail the process of testing, including the submission of AI-generated content to these tools and the subsequent detection rates. The speaker points out that while some tools like Undetectable and Phrasy managed to bypass Originality's detection, others failed, particularly Bypass AI, which was identified as AI-generated by Originality. The speaker concludes by advising against the direct submission of AI-generated content and suggests using such tools to aid in understanding and structuring one's own work, rather than as a substitute for original writing.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡AI Content Detection

AI Content Detection refers to the use of artificial intelligence algorithms to identify and flag content that may have been generated by AI rather than written by a human. In the video, the narrator discusses testing various services to bypass these detection systems. The theme revolves around the effectiveness of these services in fooling AI detectors, with the aim of submitting AI-generated content as original work, which raises ethical concerns.

💡PhD Abstract

A PhD Abstract is a brief summary of a doctoral dissertation, highlighting the main research questions, methods, and conclusions. In the context of the video, the narrator uses an old PhD abstract, written in 2011, as a control to test the AI detection systems, ensuring that it is recognized as human-written content.

💡Originality

Originality, in the context of academic writing, refers to the uniqueness and non-plagiarized nature of the content. The video mentions 'Originality' as a service that detects AI-generated content, and it is portrayed as being more effective than other tools in identifying non-original submissions.

💡Turnitin

Turnitin is a widely used plagiarism detection service in academic institutions. The video script points out that Turnitin was not very effective in detecting AI-generated content, which raises questions about its reliability in identifying non-original work in the era of AI-generated texts.

💡AI Bypass Tools

AI Bypass Tools are services designed to modify AI-generated content to make it appear as if it was written by a human, thus avoiding detection by AI content detection systems. The video provides a comparative analysis of several such tools, evaluating their effectiveness in bypassing AI detection mechanisms.

💡Fasley AI

Fasley AI is one of the AI bypass tools tested in the video. The narrator paid for the service to test its ability to rewrite content in a way that would not be flagged by AI detection systems. The results showed that Fasley AI was successful in bypassing Turnitin and gp0, but not Originality's detection.

💡Stealth Writer

Stealth Writer is another AI bypass tool mentioned in the video. It is used to 'humanize' AI-generated content. The tool was tested alongside others, and while it managed to bypass Turnitin and gp0, Originality still detected some AI origins, albeit with a lower confidence score.

💡Undetectable

Undetectable is an AI bypass tool that the narrator describes as one of the best for getting around AI content detection. The tool was tested and showed mixed results, with Turnitin and gp0 not detecting AI origins, but Originality identifying a 2% chance of AI generation.

💡Bypass AI

Bypass AI is an AI bypass tool that the narrator had high expectations for, given the accidental purchase of a year's subscription. However, the results were disappointing, as Originality detected the content as 100% AI-generated, indicating that the tool was not effective in fooling the detection system.

💡Hick Bypass

Hick Bypass is an AI tool designed to bypass AI detection. The narrator used the latest model of this tool in the test. The results showed that while Turnitin and gp0 did not detect AI origins, Originality did, with a 56% confidence score, suggesting that the tool was somewhat effective but not perfect in avoiding detection.

💡Academic Integrity

Academic Integrity refers to the ethical guidelines and principles that govern academic work, including honesty, trust, fairness, respect, and responsibility. The video indirectly addresses academic integrity by discussing the use of AI bypass tools to submit AI-generated content as original work, which would be a violation of these principles.

Highlights

The author tested five services to bypass AI content detection.

The original PhD abstract from 2011 was not detected as AI-generated by any service.

Rewritten abstract by Chat GPT was detected as 40% AI by Turnitin, 100% AI by Originality, and 94% AI by GPT-0.

Turnitin was found to be the least effective at detecting AI content.

Originality was the most effective at detecting AI content, even after using bypass tools.

Fasley AI was able to bypass AI detection with a 3% chance of being AI-generated according to Turnitin.

Stealth Writer showed a 39% Originality score, indicating AI content, but was undetected by Turnitin and GPT-0.

Undetectable was the best at bypassing Originality's detection with only a 2% chance of being AI-generated.

Bypass AI failed to bypass Originality's detection, with a 100% AI score.

Hick Bypass showed a 56% AI score by Originality, indicating partial success in bypassing detection.

Turnitin and GPT-0 were unable to detect AI content effectively even with known AI-generated content.

The author suggests using AI bypass tools as a scaffold for understanding and not for direct submission.

Unnatural word choices and phrasing were common in the AI-generated content.

The author emphasizes the importance of building upon AI-generated content with one's own understanding.

AI content should not be passed off as one's own work without proper understanding and modification.

The author recommends further exploration of AI tools for academic purposes in a separate video.