Judging GPT-AI-powered debate judging tool.
AI-powered tool for precise debate judgments.
Related Tools
Load More
GPT Idea Evaluator
Pitch me your GPT idea, and I'll rate it out of 10.
GPT Instruction Genius
[V4] Crafts detailed instructions from your ideas, to create GPTs that provide structured and consistent outputs. Tip: Write '/changelog' to see the latest changes!
Correct English GPT
Write English like a native speaker. Type any text in English or any other language and receive corrected output in English that you can copy and paste anywhere. To improve the style of the corrected text, send "s"
Research GPT
Your go-to source for well-researched information!
杠精GPT
别来碰瓷，杠就是我赢
Probability Predictor GPT
Predicts the probability of various event outcomes based on the details you share.
20.0 / 5 (200 votes)
Detailed Introduction to Judging GPT
Judging GPT is a specialized version of the ChatGPT model, designed for evaluating debates in the British Parliamentary (BP) format. Its primary function is to assist in the detailed and accurate adjudication of debates, following guidelines like the EUDC Judging Manual and the Korea WUDC Speaker Scale. Judging GPT operates by comparing and analyzing the quality of arguments, rebuttals, and engagement between teams in a debate. It assumes that claims without evidence are unsubstantiated and that teams have a burden of response towards the preceding speakers. For example, if Opening Government (OG) presents a strong case and Closing Opposition (CO) fails to address it, Judging GPT would mark CO down for lack of engagement.
Main Functions of Judging GPT
Pairwise Comparison of Teams
ExampleJudging GPT compares teams head-to-head, such as assessing Opening Government (OG) against Opening Opposition (OO) or Closing Government (CG) against Closing Opposition (CO).
ScenarioIn a debate where OG presents a policy and OO offers weak rebuttals, but CG expands on OG’s case with new analysis, Judging GPT would determine whether CG or OG had the most compelling arguments overall and how they compared to OO and CO.
Responsive Burden Evaluation
ExampleJudging GPT checks if teams are responding adequately to arguments raised by prior speakers. If Opening Opposition fails to address key arguments made by Opening Government, it would be marked down.
ScenarioIf OG presents evidence for a policy, and OO does not engage with the policy but brings up new, unrelated points, Judging GPT would lower OO’s score due to failure in responsiveness.
Assessing Argument Strength and Rebuttals
ExampleJudging GPT evaluates the strength of both the analysis (how well an argument is supported) and rebuttals (how well teams counter arguments).
ScenarioIn a scenario where Closing Government rebuts both Opening Opposition and Closing Opposition effectively while extending new points, Judging GPT would weigh these rebuttals heavily in favor of Closing Government.
Ideal Users of Judging GPT
Debate Adjudicators
Judging GPT is ideal for debate adjudicators at competitions like EUDC or WUDC who need an impartial and structured tool to assist in analyzing complex debates and ensuring consistency with judging guidelines.
Debate Coaches and Debaters
Debate coaches and debaters can benefit from Judging GPT’s detailed analysis functions to improve their argumentation, rebuttal strategies, and understanding of adjudication criteria, helping them prepare for future debates.
Steps to Use Judging GPT
1
Visit aichatonline.org for a free trial without login, no need for ChatGPT Plus.
2
Understand the debate format, such as British Parliamentary (BP), since Judging GPT is optimized for debates like EUDC and WUDC. Familiarize yourself with concepts like rebuttal, extensions, and persuasiveness.
3
Upload files such as motions, info slides, and judging manuals (if needed) to provide Judging GPT with context and resources to assess the debate effectively.
4
Ask specific questions about the debate round or seek a comparison of the teams based on argumentation, analysis, and engagement. Ensure questions are clear and related to debate dynamics.
5
Analyze the feedback and scores provided by Judging GPT, which are based on the comparison of teams in terms of argument quality, role fulfillment, and rebuttal strength, similar to official judging guidelines.
Try other advanced and practical GPTs
International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) Transcriber
AI-powered tool for precise phonetic transcriptions.
Physics Problem Solver
AI-Powered Solutions for Complex Physics Problems
费曼原则导师
Master Complex Concepts with AI Guidance
brandplate
AI-driven branding and website design.
ExpertGPT
AI-driven insights at your command.
Mein SEO Experte
AI-powered SEO insights for your site.
Brick Set Creator
AI-powered LEGO set designer
Firstsales.io - Cold Email Generator
AI-Powered Cold Email Generator for Sales
Jewish Insight
Your AI-powered guide to Jewish learning
One Word Logo Maker
AI-powered logo creation for everyone.
Ecommerce Online SEO Listing Generator
AI-Powered eBay Listing Optimization
AI Scala Programmer
AI-powered Scala expertise at your fingertips.
- Argument Analysis
- Debate Judging
- Speech Scoring
- Rebuttal Evaluation
- Role Fulfillment
Common Questions About Judging GPT
How does Judging GPT score debates?
Judging GPT uses official guidelines such as the WUDC Speaker Scale and the EUDC Judging Manual to score teams based on argumentation, rebuttal, style, and role fulfillment. It compares each team's performance pairwise.
Can Judging GPT handle different debate formats?
Yes, Judging GPT is optimized for British Parliamentary (BP) format debates, such as those used in EUDC and WUDC. It can also assess other formats but performs best in BP.
What kind of files can I upload to assist Judging GPT?
You can upload motions, info slides, and judging manuals to give Judging GPT the necessary context for evaluating a debate. This ensures that your assessments are as accurate as possible.
Does Judging GPT account for rebuttals between teams?
Yes, Judging GPT evaluates teams based on how well they engage with arguments presented earlier in the debate, comparing their rebuttals and responses to opposing teams.
Is Judging GPT capable of handling complex debate topics?
Absolutely. Judging GPT analyzes complex arguments and makes comparisons, focusing on clarity, depth of analysis, and overall persuasiveness, regardless of topic complexity.