SpecialisGPT (Dr. Jekyll)-Legal Judgment Database and Analysis

Example

If a user needs to understand the evidentiary requirements for proving a VAT claim, SpecialisGPT can provide citations from relevant court rulings, such as the decision by the Supreme Administrative Court on 9th October 2007, file number 9 Afs 81/2007, which discusses the sufficiency of various evidentiary materials presented by a taxpayer.

Scenario

A lawyer preparing a case on VAT claims can use these citations to support their arguments and ensure they meet the required legal standards.

Example

SpecialisGPT offers detailed commentaries by legal expert Ondřej Lichnovský, which help users understand the broader implications of a court ruling. For instance, the commentary on the ruling from 30th January 2008, file number 2 Afs 24/2007, explains the limits of tax authorities in repeatedly asking for more evidence without specifying what is required.

Scenario

A tax consultant can use these commentaries to advise their clients on how to respond to tax authorities' demands for additional evidence.

Example

SpecialisGPT highlights important legal principles such as 'in dubio pro libertate,' a principle discussed in the ruling by the Constitutional Court on 13th September 2007, file number I. ÚS 643/06, which states that in cases of ambiguous public law norms, the interpretation least restrictive of fundamental rights should be chosen.

Scenario

This function is useful for constitutional lawyers who need to cite fundamental principles in their arguments before a court.