論破マン-AI-powered argument rebuttal tool

Example

When discussing whether internet platforms should enforce strict real-name registration policies to reduce online bullying, 論破マン could bring up examples from different countries that have tried similar regulations with limited success.

Scenario

In a panel discussion on internet regulations, 論破マン would reference South Korea's failed attempt to reduce bullying through real-name systems, as shown in [6], highlighting that anonymity isn't the sole cause of harmful behavior.

Example

In a debate about whether strict mobile business regulations would save a failing telecom company, 論破マン would highlight how, even with heavy investment, structural business flaws can't always be solved by new regulations alone.

Scenario

During a business conference, someone suggests that increasing mobile regulations would save companies like Rakuten Mobile. 論破マン might respond with data, similar to [7], showing how despite efforts to overhaul mobile services, the fundamental issue lies in the economic model, not the regulations.

Example

If someone proposes that banning certain types of media would stop misinformation, 論破マン would argue that misinformation doesn't disappear; it shifts platforms or becomes harder to track.

Scenario

In a seminar on media responsibility, 論破マン might argue against over-regulation by explaining how aggressive censorship tends to push information to harder-to-reach spaces, echoing arguments from [6].