🔥How to Use Turnitin AI Detection Checker For FREE

WordsAtScale
22 Jun 202310:10

TLDRIn this informative video, the host discusses the concerns surrounding AI detection in content creation and offers a method to check for AI-generated content without using Turnitin. They compare various AI detection tools for accuracy and demonstrate how to use free tools like Copyleaks and Content at Scale as reliable proxies for Turnitin. The experiment shows that after transforming AI-generated essays with undetectable.ai, these tools can accurately gauge the human-likeness of the content, providing reassurance for creators.

Takeaways

  • 🔥 AI detection is not a concern for most people unless they are in a niche market, academia, or writing for clients who test outputs with AI detection tools.
  • 🌐 Evidence shows that AI-generated content can rank on the first page of Google, and the speaker's own websites confirm this.
  • 📝 The video demonstrates a trick to check AI outputs without using Turnitin, which is a popular academic tool for plagiarism detection.
  • 📚 The speaker generated essays on popular topics and tested various AI detection tools against them, including low, medium, and high-quality AI outputs.
  • 🛠️ The AI detection tools tested were Content at Scale, Copyleaks, CrossCheck, Originality, and Turnitin, with a focus on free or easily accessible versions.
  • 📊 The experiment aimed to find correlations between the AI detection tools' results and Turnitin to determine reliable proxies for AI detection.
  • 📉 Originality's scores were not reliable when compared with Turnitin, showing low correlation and inconsistencies in results.
  • 📈 Copyleaks' basic model showed a strong correlation with Turnitin, suggesting it can be used as a reliable proxy for AI detection.
  • 🛑 After transforming AI outputs with undetectable.ai, Originality consistently returned zero percent AI, indicating high human-like scores.
  • 🔍 For transformed outputs, Content at Scale and CrossCheck can be used to gauge how they might fare with Turnitin, assuming similar results.
  • 👍 The video concludes that using Copyleaks for basic AI text checks and Content at Scale or CrossCheck for transformed outputs can effectively bypass the need for Turnitin.

Q & A

  • What is the main topic of the video?

    -The main topic of the video is about AI detection and how to check outputs with Turnitin AI Detection Checker for free.

  • Why should people not be worried about AI detection?

    -People should not be worried about AI detection if they are not in a niche that is prone to plagiarism checks, academia, or writing for clients who require AI detection testing.

  • What evidence does the video provide to support the claim that AI-generated content can rank well online?

    -The video mentions that there is already evidence on the internet showing that AI-generated content can rank on the first page of Google, and the speaker can attest to this with their own websites.

  • What is the process of the experiment conducted in the video?

    -The process involves generating a list of popular essay topics, creating essays for each topic, selecting AI detectors, and testing them against different types of outputs (low quality AI, human-written, and high-quality AI).

  • Which AI detection tools were selected for the experiment and why?

    -Content at Scale, Copyleaks, and CrossCheck were selected because they offer free versions with minimal limitations. Originality.ai was also included for comparison.

  • What was the purpose of testing the AI detection tools against the transformed outputs?

    -The purpose was to see how these tools would react to outputs that had been altered to be less detectable by AI, using a service like Undetectable.ai.

  • What was the result of the experiment with Originality in terms of correlation with Turnitin?

    -Originality showed a correlation of almost 40 percent with Turnitin, which is considered unreliable as a correlation coefficient of 0.6 or 0.7 is needed for reliability.

  • How did Copyleaks Basic model perform in comparison to Turnitin?

    -Copyleaks Basic model correlated 75% of the time with Turnitin, indicating that it can be used as a reliable proxy for Turnitin checks.

  • What conclusion can be drawn from the experiment regarding the use of Copyleaks and Content at Scale for AI detection?

    -If you have your own methods of transforming AI-generated text and want to check its state, you can use Copyleaks for basic checks. For transformed outputs, Content at Scale or CrossCheck can be used as proxies to predict Turnitin results.

  • What is the advice given for those who want to bypass AI detection?

    -The advice is to use Copyleaks for basic AI-generated text checks and Content at Scale or CrossCheck for transformed outputs. These tools can be used as proxies for Turnitin results.

Outlines

00:00

😀 AI Detection and Content Ranking Insights

This paragraph discusses the common concern about AI detection in content creation and the speaker's stance that it's unnecessary to worry unless in a niche field or academia. The speaker emphasizes that AI-generated content ranks well on Google and will demonstrate a method to check AI outputs without using AI detection tools. The video also compares different AI detection tools for accuracy. The process involves generating essays on popular topics, using AI detectors, and testing them on various outputs. The speaker chose free AI detection tools without limitations for the experiment and tested them on essays both original and altered using 'undetectable.ai' with settings to make the AI output appear more human.

05:00

🔍 Experiment Results on AI Detection Tools

The speaker presents the results of an experiment comparing AI detection tools against Turnitin, a leading plagiarism detection service. Originality, one of the tools, was found to be unreliable due to inconsistent scores and a low correlation with Turnitin. CrossCheck and Content at Scale showed negative correlation, rendering them unusable as proxies. However, Copyleaks' basic model demonstrated a strong correlation with Turnitin, suggesting it can be used as a reliable proxy. When testing transformed outputs using 'undetectable.ai', Originality showed zero AI detection, which was consistent across all essays, making it ineffective for correlation analysis. The average scores from CrossCheck and Content at Scale indicated human-like content, suggesting these tools can be used to estimate how transformed AI content might fare with Turnitin.

10:01

📢 Conclusion and Call to Action

In conclusion, the speaker summarizes the findings, advising that if one has methods to transform AI-generated text, Copyleaks can be used for a basic AI content check. For transformed content, Content at Scale or CrossCheck can provide an estimate of how it would score with Turnitin. The speaker highlights that Content at Scale is completely free, while CrossCheck allows a few tests per session, easily bypassed by changing the browser or IP address. The paragraph ends with an encouragement for viewers to share, subscribe, and look forward to the next video.

Mindmap

Keywords

💡AI detection

AI detection refers to the process of identifying whether a piece of content has been generated by artificial intelligence. In the video, the creator discusses the concerns people have about AI-generated content being detected, particularly in academic or professional settings. The video aims to provide insights on how to check for AI-generated content without using Turnitin, a popular plagiarism detection service.

💡Turnitin

Turnitin is a widely recognized plagiarism detection software used in academic institutions to check the originality of students' work. The video script mentions Turnitin as a benchmark for comparing the accuracy of other AI detection tools, suggesting that if other tools show a high correlation with Turnitin's results, they can be used as reliable proxies.

💡Content at Scale

Content at Scale is one of the AI detection tools mentioned in the video. It is highlighted as a tool that can be used without any limitations, making it a suitable option for those who want to check the originality of their content without restrictions.

💡Copyleaks

Copyleaks is another AI detection tool discussed in the video. It is noted for having some usage limits, but these can be bypassed by using incognito mode in a browser or toggling a VPN on and off, making it a versatile option for checking AI-generated content.

💡CrossCheck

CrossCheck, while not explicitly mentioned in the script, is implied to be a part of the comparison of AI detection tools. It is likely a service that checks for similarities between the submitted content and existing sources to determine originality.

💡Originality

In the context of the video, originality refers to the uniqueness of a piece of content. The script discusses the use of the Originality AI tool to check the originality of essays, noting that it may not be a reliable metric when used in conjunction with Turnitin due to the lack of strong correlation.

💡Correlation

Correlation in the video script is used to describe the relationship between the results given by different AI detection tools and Turnitin. A high correlation would indicate that the tool is providing results that are similar to Turnitin, suggesting it can be used as a reliable proxy for AI detection.

💡Proxies

Proxies in this context are AI detection tools that can stand in for Turnitin, providing similar results and thus not requiring the use of Turnitin itself. The video suggests that if a tool shows a high correlation with Turnitin, it can be used as a proxy for checking AI-generated content.

💡Undetected.ai

Undetected.ai is a service mentioned for altering AI-generated content to make it less detectable by AI detection tools. The script describes an experiment where essays were altered using this service and then tested with various AI detection tools to see if they could still be identified as AI-generated.

💡Human-like output

Human-like output refers to AI-generated content that closely resembles writing done by a human. The video script discusses the use of settings in AI tools to make the generated content appear more human-like, which can help in bypassing AI detection.

💡Plagiarism

Although not explicitly mentioned, the concept of plagiarism is central to the discussion of AI detection. Plagiarism is the act of using someone else's work without giving proper credit, and AI detection tools are used to prevent this by ensuring the originality of content.

Highlights

Introduction to the topic of AI detection and the presenter's stance on its relevance.

AI detection is not a concern unless in a niche, academia, or writing for clients who use AI detection.

Evidence of AI-generated content ranking on Google's first page.

Demonstration of a trick to check outputs with Turnitin without using it.

Comparison of different AI detection tools for accuracy.

Process of generating a list of popular essay topics and essays for testing AI detection.

Selection of AI detection tools for the experiment and their availability.

Testing the correlation between AI detection tools and Turnitin.

Originality's unreliability as a metric when used with Turnitin.

Copyleaks' correlation with Turnitin and its potential as a reliable proxy.

The use of undetectable.ai to alter essays for testing against AI detection tools.

Results showing Originality's inconsistency with Turnitin's AI detection scores.

Copyleaks' high correlation with Turnitin, suggesting its reliability as a proxy.

How to use Copyleaks for checking AI-generated text if you have your own transformation methods.

Testing transformed outputs with AI detection tools and their results.

Content at Scale and CrossCheck as alternatives to Turnitin for transformed outputs.

Conclusion on using proxy tools for AI detection and the ease of bypassing limitations.

Encouragement to share, subscribe, and look forward to the next video.